← All creators

Rakesh Gohel

@rakeshgohel01 Creator on LinkedIn Canada

Not known. No price benchmark we trust for LinkedIn.

LinkedIn Open on LinkedIn
Checks out How to reach them
average reach a post LinkedIn publishes no view counts, so there is no reach figure here.
followers 166,716 From LinkedIn's own API. Read Sep 4, 2026.
posts every 24 days across 9 recent posts
last posted 3mo ago Read Sep 4, 2026.

Recent post performance

Likes on their last 9 posts

Average likes537
LikesAverage

Oct 29, 2025 to Jun 23, 2026. Oldest to newest.

View post data9 posts
Likes on their last 9 posts, with dates and paid partnership flags
PostDateLikesPromotion flag
160+ page guide covers top questions regarding Multi-AI Agents From Ideation, Design to Deployment, here's everything t935Not flagged
Production AI Agents are 90% engineering and only 10% AI Here are the 7 concepts that separate demos that scale.... If560Not flagged
Your RAG pipeline needs AI Agents to handle complex tasks Let’s break down the 4 architectures that actually work... M337Not flagged
According to Deloitte, only 11% of your AI agents are in production Despite 38% of them being piloted, here's why... D197Not flagged
Most legacy modernization initiatives with AI Agents fail Not "go over budget" They outright fail... If you’re a leade358Not flagged
AI Agents need more than just a model and prompts They need a structured systematic build process. Let me explain why..1,476Not flagged
An AI Agent without a system is just an expensive prompt Here's the 7-step framework to build one that works… The tool335Not flagged
AI agents don't need better models. They need better data plumbing. 12 concepts that turn a fragile agent into a produc125Not flagged
AI agents don't break at the LLM. They break at the RAG pipeline. 95% of enterprise GenAI pilots deliver zero measurabl509Not flagged

Can you sponsor them?

Not known. Nothing on record either way. Ask them directly.

No price benchmark we trust for LinkedIn.

Ask them directly

Who sponsors Rakesh Gohel?

No sponsorships have been documented yet. Nothing on record either way, so ask them directly.

What we checked

20 checks, 10 passed
✓ Metrics came from the platform Every audience figure here is a value LinkedIn's own API returned, never estimated or inferred. The price estimate is the one number we work out ourselves, and it is labelled and shows its arithmetic. not published
✓ Enough recent posts to judge 9 recent posts sampled (target 3). not published
✓ LinkedIn floor: ≥80 median reactions and ≥4,000 followers LinkedIn does not publish view counts on public posts, so reach is judged on reactions. 358 median reactions, 166,716 followers. required
– View counts LinkedIn exposes no impression or view count on public posts. Any tool quoting a LinkedIn creator's "views" is estimating. not published
✓ Tech / dev / software engineering 35 distinct dev signals in the bio and post text: rust, scala, react, backend, http, pipeline. required
✓ Not a gaming channel No gaming signal in the text. LinkedIn publishes no content category, so this is a text judgement. required
✓ Not a hardware / gear channel No hardware/gear pattern. preference
✓ Target region (US / UK / EU / AU / NZ / SG) Canada (CA), from the platform's country routing. required
– Engagement rate LinkedIn publishes no view count, so a rate (engagement ÷ views) is not computable. Absolute counts are shown instead. not published
– Average is not one viral outlier No view counts on this platform. not published
– Comment volume matches the view counts Comment counts were not returned for this account. not published
– Reach plausible for the audience count No view counts on this platform. not published
✓ Posted recently Last post 76 day(s) ago. preference
✓ Publishes on a regular schedule Median 24 day(s) between posts; the 9 sampled posts span 237 days. preference
– Sampled posts are recent enough to compare Too few dated posts with counts to test whether the sample is comparable. not published
– Same numbers from two endpoints of the same API No post from this account appeared in both the search index and the profile feed, so there was nothing to cross-check. not published
– Verified against the platform's own published feed LinkedIn publishes no independent public feed to check the API's numbers against. YouTube is the only platform here where that second source exists. not published
✓ An independent creator, not a company's own channel Nothing marks this as a company-run channel: it is not a known company account, the name carries no corporate designation, and the bio is not written in a company's voice. required
– Same person confirmed on other platforms No other public profile was linked from this account, so this record covers one platform only. not published
– Runs paid promotions (platform-declared) Sponsorships shown for this creator are parsed from the text of their own post descriptions, so they are suspected rather than platform-confirmed. not published
Sponsors How it works JSON Want a hand choosing creators?