โ† All creators

Programming Hub

@programminghub.io Creator on Threads

Not known. No price benchmark we trust for Threads.

Threads Open on Threads
2 to check How to reach them
average reach a post Threads publishes no view counts, so there is no reach figure here.
followers 21,301 From Threads's own API. Read Sep 4, 2026.
posts every day across 8 recent posts
last posted 10d ago Read Sep 4, 2026.

Recent post performance

Likes on their last 8 posts

Average likes1
LikesAverage

Aug 26, 2026 to Sep 3, 2026. Oldest to newest.

View post data8 posts
Likes on their last 8 posts, with dates and paid partnership flags
PostDateLikesPromotion flag
Heroku and Fly.io aren't on this list anymore, and neither are half the platforms everyone still recommends out of habit2Not flagged
everyone says break it into microservices almost nobody tells you when that decision actually pays off this is one real 0Not flagged
debugging shouldn't feel like guesswork these tools help you catch what's actually breaking before your users do . . . .2Not flagged
google's newest coding tool doesn't just autocomplete it plans, executes, and checks its own work here's what antigravit0Not flagged
everyone talks about which ide or which laptop but almost nobody talks about which apps are actually on a developer's ph1Not flagged
Your phone doesn't just send a text it hands it off through cell towers protocols and servers you've never thought about0Not flagged
Have you ever wondered this before?1Not flagged
Your dev tools folder is probably missing at least one of these five extensions turn any page into an instant answer to 0Not flagged

Can you sponsor them?

Not known. Nothing on record either way. Ask them directly.

No price benchmark we trust for Threads.

Ask them directly

Who sponsors Programming Hub?

No sponsorships have been documented yet. Nothing on record either way, so ask them directly.

What we checked

20 checks, 8 passed, 2 to review
โœ“ Metrics came from the platform Every audience figure here is a value Threads's own API returned, never estimated or inferred. The price estimate is the one number we work out ourselves, and it is labelled and shows its arithmetic. not published
โœ“ Enough recent posts to judge 8 recent posts sampled (target 8). not published
! Threads floor: โ‰ฅ40 median reactions and โ‰ฅ8,000 followers Threads does not publish view counts on public posts, so reach is judged on reactions. 1 median reactions, 21,301 followers. below the audience minimum
โ€“ View counts Threads exposes no impression or view count on public posts. Any tool quoting a Threads creator's "views" is estimating. not published
โœ“ Tech / dev / software engineering 14 distinct dev signals in the bio and post text: perl, backend, webdev, deploy, software, programming. required
โœ“ Not a gaming channel No gaming signal in the text. Threads publishes no content category, so this is a text judgement. required
โœ“ Not a hardware / gear channel No hardware/gear pattern. preference
! Target region (US / UK / EU / AU / NZ / SG) Threads exposes no location field at all. Region is unknown and must not be claimed. required
โ€“ Engagement rate Threads publishes no view count, so a rate (engagement รท views) is not computable. Absolute counts are shown instead. not published
โ€“ Average is not one viral outlier No view counts on this platform. not published
โ€“ Comment volume matches the view counts Comment counts were not returned for this account. not published
โ€“ Reach plausible for the audience count No view counts on this platform. not published
โœ“ Posted recently Last post 10 day(s) ago. preference
โœ“ Publishes on a regular schedule Median 1 day(s) between posts; the 8 sampled posts span 8 days. preference
โ€“ Sampled posts are recent enough to compare Too few dated posts with counts to test whether the sample is comparable. not published
โ€“ Same numbers from two endpoints of the same API No post from this account appeared in both the search index and the profile feed, so there was nothing to cross-check. not published
โ€“ Verified against the platform's own published feed Threads publishes no independent public feed to check the API's numbers against. YouTube is the only platform here where that second source exists. not published
โœ“ An independent creator, not a company's own channel Nothing marks this as a company-run channel: it is not a known company account, the name carries no corporate designation, and the bio is not written in a company's voice. required
โ€“ Same person confirmed on other platforms No other public profile was linked from this account, so this record covers one platform only. not published
โ€“ Runs paid promotions (platform-declared) Sponsorships shown for this creator are parsed from the text of their own post descriptions, so they are suspected rather than platform-confirmed. not published
Sponsors How it works JSON Want a hand choosing creators?