← All creators

Mayank A.

@curiouslearner Creator on LinkedIn India

Not known. No price benchmark we trust for LinkedIn.

LinkedIn Open on LinkedIn
1 to check How to reach them
average reach a post LinkedIn publishes no view counts, so there is no reach figure here.
followers 181,682 From LinkedIn's own API. Read Sep 4, 2026.
posts every 37 days across 7 recent posts
last posted 27d ago Read Sep 4, 2026.

Recent post performance

Likes on their last 7 posts

Average likes394
LikesAverage

Nov 2, 2025 to Aug 17, 2026. Oldest to newest.

View post data7 posts
Likes on their last 7 posts, with dates and paid partnership flags
PostDateLikesPromotion flag
Your code reviews are killing team morale. (And you don't even know it.) Most developers think they're being helpful. T235Not flagged
Wish someone had told me this about code review etiquette 🚀 The goal is shipping reliable code, not winning arguments.248Not flagged
Most code reviews are just senior devs flexing. They’ll reject your PR over formatting while ignoring the logic bomb you353Not flagged
The right order for learning AI engineering in 2026 What most people do: → Jump to agents → Skip foundations → Ignore M293Not flagged
Someone finally built a production-grade Agent OS in pure Rust. OpenFang isn't a Python wrapper or a generic multi-agen588Not flagged
Something has been bothering me about how we think about code review. We've made it remarkably sophisticated. Static an774Not flagged
One of the best LLM engineering playlists. It’s Stanford’s CS336: Language Modeling from Scratch, 19 lectures covering:268Not flagged

Can you sponsor them?

Not known. Nothing on record either way. Ask them directly.

No price benchmark we trust for LinkedIn.

Ask them directly

Who sponsors Mayank A.?

No sponsorships have been documented yet. Nothing on record either way, so ask them directly.

What we checked

20 checks, 9 passed, 1 to review
Metrics came from the platform Every audience figure here is a value LinkedIn's own API returned, never estimated or inferred. The price estimate is the one number we work out ourselves, and it is labelled and shows its arithmetic. not published
Enough recent posts to judge 7 recent posts sampled (target 3). not published
LinkedIn floor: ≥80 median reactions and ≥4,000 followers LinkedIn does not publish view counts on public posts, so reach is judged on reactions. 293 median reactions, 181,682 followers. required
View counts LinkedIn exposes no impression or view count on public posts. Any tool quoting a LinkedIn creator's "views" is estimating. not published
Tech / dev / software engineering 26 distinct dev signals in the bio and post text: python, rust, scala, backend, http, container. required
Not a gaming channel No gaming signal in the text. LinkedIn publishes no content category, so this is a text judgement. required
Not a hardware / gear channel No hardware/gear pattern. preference
! Target region (US / UK / EU / AU / NZ / SG) India is outside the brief's target markets. outside the original target regions
Engagement rate LinkedIn publishes no view count, so a rate (engagement ÷ views) is not computable. Absolute counts are shown instead. not published
Average is not one viral outlier No view counts on this platform. not published
Comment volume matches the view counts Comment counts were not returned for this account. not published
Reach plausible for the audience count No view counts on this platform. not published
Posted recently Last post 27 day(s) ago. preference
Publishes on a regular schedule Median 36.6 day(s) between posts; the 7 sampled posts span 288 days. preference
Sampled posts are recent enough to compare Too few dated posts with counts to test whether the sample is comparable. not published
Same numbers from two endpoints of the same API No post from this account appeared in both the search index and the profile feed, so there was nothing to cross-check. not published
Verified against the platform's own published feed LinkedIn publishes no independent public feed to check the API's numbers against. YouTube is the only platform here where that second source exists. not published
An independent creator, not a company's own channel Nothing marks this as a company-run channel: it is not a known company account, the name carries no corporate designation, and the bio is not written in a company's voice. required
Same person confirmed on other platforms No other public profile was linked from this account, so this record covers one platform only. not published
Runs paid promotions (platform-declared) Sponsorships shown for this creator are parsed from the text of their own post descriptions, so they are suspected rather than platform-confirmed. not published
Sponsors How it works JSON Want a hand choosing creators?