← All creators

Boris Cherny

@boris_cherny Creator on Threads

Not known. No price benchmark we trust for Threads.

Threads Open on Threads
1 to check How to reach them
average reach a post Threads publishes no view counts, so there is no reach figure here.
followers 167,728 From Threads's own API. Read Sep 4, 2026.
posts every 6 days across 8 recent posts
last posted 3d ago Read Sep 4, 2026.

Recent post performance

Likes on their last 8 posts

Average likes572
LikesAverage

Jul 15, 2026 to Sep 3, 2026. Oldest to newest.

View post data8 posts
Likes on their last 8 posts, with dates and paid partnership flags
PostDateLikesPromotion flag
Something I have been thinking about: in the past, the best engineers I knew spent a lot of time automating their work i1,244Not flagged
I talk to engineers at other companies every day and hear the same thing: one person is 10x'ing their output with Claude951Not flagged
Opus 5 is a great model for coding, data analysis, design, biology, knowledge work. More than any of these eval scores,625Not flagged
turns out you can get indirect prompt injection to ~0 on unseen attacks if you stack enough layers (model training + inp534Not flagged
A weird experiment I've been trying the last few weeks is having Claude take over day-to-day maintenance of our apps. Se607Not flagged
Fable 5.1 is our best model yet for coding, data analysis, computer use, design, presentations, Tag, and the hardest lon483Not flagged
Your input needed: would you use this? This is an early look at how we're thinking about making Claude Code way more ex106Not flagged
Background computer use is underrated25Not flagged

Can you sponsor them?

Not known. Nothing on record either way. Ask them directly.

No price benchmark we trust for Threads.

Ask them directly

What we checked

20 checks, 9 passed, 1 to review
Metrics came from the platform Every audience figure here is a value Threads's own API returned, never estimated or inferred. The price estimate is the one number we work out ourselves, and it is labelled and shows its arithmetic. not published
Enough recent posts to judge 8 recent posts sampled (target 8). not published
Threads floor: ≥40 median reactions and ≥8,000 followers Threads does not publish view counts on public posts, so reach is judged on reactions. 571 median reactions, 167,728 followers. required
View counts Threads exposes no impression or view count on public posts. Any tool quoting a Threads creator's "views" is estimating. not published
Tech / dev / software engineering 7 distinct dev signals in the bio and post text: http, vim, emacs, coding, engineer, github. required
Not a gaming channel No gaming signal in the text. Threads publishes no content category, so this is a text judgement. required
Not a hardware / gear channel No hardware/gear pattern. preference
! Target region (US / UK / EU / AU / NZ / SG) Threads exposes no location field at all. Region is unknown and must not be claimed. required
Engagement rate Threads publishes no view count, so a rate (engagement ÷ views) is not computable. Absolute counts are shown instead. not published
Average is not one viral outlier No view counts on this platform. not published
Comment volume matches the view counts Comment counts were not returned for this account. not published
Reach plausible for the audience count No view counts on this platform. not published
Posted recently Last post 4 day(s) ago. preference
Publishes on a regular schedule Median 5.9 day(s) between posts; the 8 sampled posts span 50 days. preference
Sampled posts are recent enough to compare Too few dated posts with counts to test whether the sample is comparable. not published
Same numbers from two endpoints of the same API No post from this account appeared in both the search index and the profile feed, so there was nothing to cross-check. not published
Verified against the platform's own published feed Threads publishes no independent public feed to check the API's numbers against. YouTube is the only platform here where that second source exists. not published
An independent creator, not a company's own channel Nothing marks this as a company-run channel: it is not a known company account, the name carries no corporate designation, and the bio is not written in a company's voice. required
Same person confirmed on other platforms No other public profile was linked from this account, so this record covers one platform only. not published
Runs paid promotions (platform-declared) Sponsorships shown for this creator are parsed from the text of their own post descriptions, so they are suspected rather than platform-confirmed. not published
Sponsors How it works JSON Want a hand choosing creators?