← All creators

코난쌤

@conanssam Creator on Threads

Not known. No price benchmark we trust for Threads.

Threads Open on Threads
2 to check How to reach them
average reach a post Threads publishes no view counts, so there is no reach figure here.
followers 10,269 From Threads's own API. Read Sep 4, 2026.
posts every day across 8 recent posts
last posted 10d ago Read Sep 4, 2026.

Recent post performance

Likes on their last 8 posts

Average likes6
LikesAverage

Sep 2, 2026 to Sep 3, 2026. Oldest to newest.

View post data8 posts
Likes on their last 8 posts, with dates and paid partnership flags
PostDateLikesPromotion flag
어제 블로그 글은 한 줄로 묶으면 에이전트 하네스, 문맥 관리, 툴 사용 경계입니다. 성능을 올리는 방법보다 더 자주 보인 질문은 이쪽입니다. 어디까지 자동화하고, 어디서 멈추게 하고, 어떤 증거로 업데이트를 통2Not flagged
Claude Code 같은 하네스는 롤아웃 중 컨텍스트를 계속 압축합니다. 이 압축된 트랜스크립트를 그대로 RL 학습 데이터로 쓰면 조건부 분포가 트리로 갈라져 성능이 무너집니다. arXiv 2609.00865(Me3Not flagged
Claude Code 같은 하네스는 롤아웃 중 컨텍스트를 계속 압축합니다. 이 압축된 트랜스크립트를 그대로 RL 학습 데이터로 쓰면 조건부 분포가 트리로 갈라져 성능이 무너집니다. arXiv 2609.00865(Me15Not flagged
SafeEvolve(arXiv 2609.02786) — 하네스만 고쳐도, 정책만 학습해도 에이전트 안전은 안 풀립니다. 이 논문은 두 바퀴를 트레이스 증거로 맞물려 돌리는 공진화 루프를 제안합니다. Qwen3.5-42Not flagged
실패한 롤아웃 안의 좋은 행동까지 전부 실패 크레딧을 받는 문제, 앵커 상태 잠재력 차이로 푼 PGPO 논문 정리했습니다. ALFWorld/WebShop에서 크리틱·추가 롤아웃 없이 WebShop 성공률 +8.47%2Not flagged
QwenLM이 1년짜리 사업 벤치마크를 공개했습니다. LLM 에이전트에게 ¥100,000을 주고 365일 동안 온라인 스토어를 운영시키는 구조입니다. 시장조사·공급자 협상·발주·가격·배송·반품·현금흐름 전부 에이전트2Not flagged
최근에 de-skill 하고 있습니다. 몇주전 omo(lazycodex), omc, omx를 지웠고 오늘은 k-skill을 오늘 지웠습니다.22Not flagged
웹 에이전트 월드 모델의 학습 목표를 하나 바꿨더니 WebArena-Lite 성공률이 13.94% → 28.48%로 올랐다는 논문이 나왔습니다 (arXiv:2609.02885). 핵심은 다음 상태를 정해진 형식으로 2Not flagged

Can you sponsor them?

Not known. Nothing on record either way. Ask them directly.

No price benchmark we trust for Threads.

Ask them directly

Who sponsors 코난쌤?

No sponsorships have been documented yet. Nothing on record either way, so ask them directly.

What we checked

20 checks, 8 passed, 2 to review
Metrics came from the platform Every audience figure here is a value Threads's own API returned, never estimated or inferred. The price estimate is the one number we work out ourselves, and it is labelled and shows its arithmetic. not published
Enough recent posts to judge 8 recent posts sampled (target 8). not published
! Threads floor: ≥40 median reactions and ≥8,000 followers Threads does not publish view counts on public posts, so reach is judged on reactions. 2 median reactions, 10,269 followers. below the audience minimum
View counts Threads exposes no impression or view count on public posts. Any tool quoting a Threads creator's "views" is estimating. not published
Tech / dev / software engineering 2 distinct dev signals in the bio and post text: llm, claude. required
Not a gaming channel No gaming signal in the text. Threads publishes no content category, so this is a text judgement. required
Not a hardware / gear channel No hardware/gear pattern. preference
! Target region (US / UK / EU / AU / NZ / SG) Threads exposes no location field at all. Region is unknown and must not be claimed. required
Engagement rate Threads publishes no view count, so a rate (engagement ÷ views) is not computable. Absolute counts are shown instead. not published
Average is not one viral outlier No view counts on this platform. not published
Comment volume matches the view counts Comment counts were not returned for this account. not published
Reach plausible for the audience count No view counts on this platform. not published
Posted recently Last post 10 day(s) ago. preference
Publishes on a regular schedule Median 0.1 day(s) between posts; the 8 sampled posts span 1 days. preference
Sampled posts are recent enough to compare Too few dated posts with counts to test whether the sample is comparable. not published
Same numbers from two endpoints of the same API No post from this account appeared in both the search index and the profile feed, so there was nothing to cross-check. not published
Verified against the platform's own published feed Threads publishes no independent public feed to check the API's numbers against. YouTube is the only platform here where that second source exists. not published
An independent creator, not a company's own channel Nothing marks this as a company-run channel: it is not a known company account, the name carries no corporate designation, and the bio is not written in a company's voice. required
Same person confirmed on other platforms No other public profile was linked from this account, so this record covers one platform only. not published
Runs paid promotions (platform-declared) Sponsorships shown for this creator are parsed from the text of their own post descriptions, so they are suspected rather than platform-confirmed. not published
Sponsors How it works JSON Want a hand choosing creators?